Legal Opinion
State v. Austin
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 9, 1996No. 95-256PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Defendant appeals an order of the Franklin District Court that revoked his probation and reinstated his underlying sentence for sexual assault. Defendant contends that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support a violation for leaving the State of Vermont without his probation officer’s permission; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support a violation of the condition that he “successfully complete any therapy on sexual aggressiveness to satisfaction of probation officer”; and (3) the probation condition requiring defendant to “submit to urinalysis testing when requested by your…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. DecoteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.