Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Crockett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1980No. Civ. 44988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

The present appeal is from a declaratory judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County finding and declaring no uninsured motorist coverage existed in favor of appellants as against respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

The undisputed facts show that Laura and John Crockett (appellants or the Crocketts) are residents of Contra Costa County, State of California, who, while visiting Hawaii in December of 1976, leased from Budget-Rent-A-Car a 1975 Volkswagen automobile.

On December 18, on the Island of Kauai, the Crockett vehicle collided with a Datsun…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Travelers Insurance v. BouzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Wheeling v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Crossley v. Pacific Employers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kirkley v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Sayan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Maidment Ex Rel. MaidmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Blais v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API