Legal Opinion

Peed v. Burleson's, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1955No. 22PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, C. J.

Only one cause of action is stated in the complaint, and that is the cause of action against the defendants for the wrongful conversion of the shipment of potatoes.

We have here, in the first instance, a case of bailment in which the respective rights of the bailor and the bailee to recover for the conversion of the bailed property is at issue.

Of course the bailor, being the owner of the property, can maintain an action for the recovery of the bailed property converted by third parties while the property was in the hands of the bailee. That right is not challenged in this action.

It is equally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Asheville & East Tennessee Railroad v. BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Fleming v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Burton v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Fleming v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CINCINNATI, NO &C. R. CO. v. HilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Mabe v. DillonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co v. HilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Frockt v. GoodloeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API