Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Our attention is first directed to the motion of the plaintiff to strike from the answer the defendant’s second further defense relating to the indemnity clause in the contract with the plaintiff, reading as follows :

“Consumer (C. J. Fleming) shall indemnify, save harmless, and defend Company (Carolina Power & Light Company) against all liability, claims or judgments, costs, and expenses for injury, loss, or damage to persons or property on account of defective construction, *402wiring or appliances on consumer’s (C. J. Fleming’s) side of point of delivery.”

The plaintiff interposed his motion to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Schnepp v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. City of Richmond v. BranchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Bell v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API