Legal Opinion
State v. Parson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1983No. 82-601PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
I
Appellant’s first proposition of law is a challenge predicated upon Crim. R. 16 relating to the regulation of discovery in criminal trials. That rule provides, in relevant part, as follows:
“(A) Demand for discovery. Upon written request each party shall forthwith provide the discovery herein allowed. Motions for discovery shall certify that demand for discovery has. been made and the discovery has not been provided.
“(B) Disclosure of evidence by the prosecuting attorney.
“(1) Information subject to disclosure.
“(a) Statement of defendant or co-defendant. Upon motion of the defendant, the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CooperOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Sylvester J. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- State v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. GrantOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WilesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.