Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1993No. 91-13PublishedCited by 276 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

GUILT-PHASE ISSUES

In Grant’s first proposition of law, she argues that all visits to her house by police and fire officials on April 1, 5 and 14 were warrantless and, except for the initial fire-fighting efforts, unlawful. The state concedes that the April 5 search was unlawful. Nonetheless, under the circumstances, Chief Cover’s testimony based on that search was cumulative and thus its admission was harmless error.

Exigent circumstances justified the warrantless search on April 1. In Michigan v. Tyler (1978), 436 U.S. 499, 510, 98 S.Ct. 1942, 1950, 56 L.Ed.2d 486, 498, the United States…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by276 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995

271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API