Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gordon v. Zangerle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1940No. 27572PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The relator attacks the system of probation and contends that the statutes relating thereto are violative of various provisions of the state Constitution.

There are three separate and distinct major methods of extending clemency in Ohio: (1) The Governor may, after conviction, grant reprieves, commutations and pardons by virtue of Section 11, Article III of the state Constitution, which contains this provision: “He [the Governor] shall have power, after conviction, to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons, for all crimes and offenses, except treason and. cases of impeachment, upon such…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Ex Parte WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. People Ex Rel. Forsyth v. . Court of SessionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. State v. Heinz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API