Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1978No. 78-211PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
The solitary issue presented is whether the failure to bring appellee to trial within 90 days was a *209denial of a speedy trial as defined in R. C. 2945.71(D), necessitating his discharge pursuant to R. C. 2945.73. R. C. 2945.71, in relevant part, provides:
“(C) A person against whom a charge of felony is pending:
* *
“(2) Shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy days after his arrest.
“(D) For purposes of computing time under divisions * * # and (C) of this section, each day during which the accused is held in jail in lieu of bail on the pending charge shall be counted as three days.”
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Standlee v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Rubera v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Stone v. SheaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.