State v. Boykin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether a gubernatorial pardon automatically entitles the recipient to have the record of the pardoned conviction sealed. We hold that the sealing of a record is not an entitlement that flows from a pardon.
I. Case Background
{¶ 2} Appellant, Montoya Boykin, was convicted six times between 1987 and 2007 for different offenses. In January 2007, she filed an application for executive clemency with the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, requesting a pardon for four of those convictions. Former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland granted the pardon. At issue in this case is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. Aguirre (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Vanzandt (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- The State Ex Rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Zachary Polk v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Radcliff (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.