Legal Opinion

State v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2013No. 2012-0808 and 2012-1216PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether a gubernatorial pardon automatically entitles the recipient to have the record of the pardoned conviction sealed. We hold that the sealing of a record is not an entitlement that flows from a pardon.

I. Case Background

{¶ 2} Appellant, Montoya Boykin, was convicted six times between 1987 and 2007 for different offenses. In January 2007, she filed an application for executive clemency with the Ohio Adult Parole Authority, requesting a pardon for four of those convictions. Former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland granted the pardon. At issue in this case is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Knote v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. Aguirre (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. Vanzandt (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. The State Ex Rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Lyons, JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Zachary Polk v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Radcliff (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API