Legal Opinion

State v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1977No. 778SC286PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant’s first and second assignments of error are directed to the voir dire examination conducted by the court to determine the legality and constitutionality of the search of defendant in the parking lot and the admissibility of the articles seized during the search and the heroin later obtained from the floor of the police station.

On the voir dire the State offered evidence tending to show: At approximately 6:00 p.m. on 7 July 1976 State Bureau of Investigation Agent Steven G. Surratt and Goldsboro Police Officer David F. Cloutier met with a confidential informant in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. United States v. Robert William Gorman and Edward Terrence RocheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. AdkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API