Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1982No. 8112SC699PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s finding and conclusion that the search of the defendant and the seizure of the pills from defendant were pursuant to a lawful arrest. This assignment of error may be resolved by an inquiry into the propriety of each stage in the chain of events beginning with the original detention of defendant by Deputy Herman and including the subsequent arrest of defendant, the search of defendant after the arrest, and Deputy Herman’s seizure of the pills found upon searching defendant.

A police officer’s limited investigatory detention of an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. RatliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API