State v. Adkerson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COZORT, Judge.
Defendants Adkerson and Eanes were charged in indictments proper in form with possession of a controlled substance. Both filed motions to suppress certain evidence; the motions were denied after a hearing. Subsequently, under a plea arrangement with the State, each defendant pled guilty to misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. From the judgments sentencing each defendant to a minimum and maximum two-year suspended term, each defendant appeals. We affirm.
At the Suppression Hearing on this matter, the State’s evidence showed that on 11 October 1986, at approximately…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. LindleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. PeeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Commonwealth v. YedinakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- State v. PulliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.