Legal Opinion

Forsyth County v. York

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 12, 1973No. 7321SC587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the evidence reveals no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E. 2d 897; Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823. Defendant contends that there were issues of material fact as to whether (1) the property was being used' for business purposes at the time of the enactment of the zoning ordinance on 3 April 1967 and (2) a mobile home was in use on the property at that time. Defendant acquired the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Town of Garner v. WestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Forsyth County v. RL YORKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Sanders v. Angie Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Town of Pinebluff v. MartsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API