Legal Opinion

Town of Garner v. Weston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The parties stipulated the Presiding Judge should hear the evidence, make findings of fact, state his conclusions of law, and enter judgment. The appellants advise us in their brief that there is no dispute with respect to the facts found in the court below. Hence the court must accept, and is bound by, Judge Hobgood’s findings. The short quotations from the findings are sufficient to support the court’s conclusion, which in turn sustains the judgment entered.

The constitutionality of the zoning ordinance, as such, is not challenged as we interpret the' record. If it is, Raleigh v. Morand, 247…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. In Re the Appeal of HastingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Local Union 755 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Fowler v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Donald L. Garren and James A. Eddinger v. City of Winston-Salem, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Metropolitan Development Commission of Marion County v. I. Ching, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Forsyth County v. YorkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API