Legal Opinion

State v. Damron

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2004PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA III, C. J„

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., and ALLEN WILSON WALLACE, Sp. J., joined.

We granted the State’s application for permission to appeal to determine whether the trial court and the Court of Criminal Appeals erred by suppressing potentially incriminating statements given by the defendant during the post-instrument phase of a polygraph test. Upon due consideration, we conclude that the lower courts erred by suppressing the statements. Although polygraph test results, testimony concerning such…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Marable v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn SextonTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. R.D.S. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McVey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. SawyerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API