Legal Opinion
State v. Walton
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 2001PublishedCited by 488 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · BarkerBarker, J.
in which ANDERSON, C.J., and DROWOTA, and HOLDER, JJ., joined.
Factual Background
The primary issue in this case is whether the appellee was subjected to custodial interrogation in violation of the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), when officers questioned him in response to his volunteered, but unwarned, statements. The Dyer County Circuit Court found that although the appellee was placed in custody, his statements to the *78police as to the location of stolen property were spontaneous, voluntary, and not the result of interrogation.…
3Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by488 opinions
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State of Tennessee v. Travis Kinte EcholsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
483 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.