Legal Opinion
R.D.S. v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 2008PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
*360OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, C.J.
in which GARY R. WADE, J., and FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, Sp.J„ joined. JANICE M. HOLDER, J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion. CORNELIA A. CLARK and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ„ not participating.
This appeal arises out of a finding of delinquency following a denial of a motion to suppress incriminating statements and seized evidence. The trial court found that the juvenile defendant was not in custody at the time he made his incriminating statements, thus not triggering Miranda, requirements; the Court of Appeals agreed. We affirm that part of the Court of Appeals’ holding. However,…
3Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by95 opinions
- Dellinger v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MeneeseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HannahTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.