Engstrom v. Bayer Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MONTEMURO, J.:
¶ 1 These consolidated appeals lie from orders dismissing with prejudice on the basis of forum non conveniens five complaints against Appellee pharmaceutical company in a mass tort 1 /products liability action. The claim is advanced by Appellants that their ingestion of certain of Ap-pellee’s products, specifically Alka-Seltzer Plus, containing the decongestant ingredient phenylpropanolamine (PPA) caused them to suffer hemorrhagic stroke resulting in permanent and profound physical damage.
¶ 2 Appellants in this matter are citizens of Missouri, Washington state, Arizona…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bochetto, G. v. Dimeling, Schreiber & ParkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Hovatter, D. v. CSX TransportationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Jessop v. ACF INDUSTRIES, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Bochetto v. Piper Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Wright v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.