Legal Opinion

Wright v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 2006No. 1752 EDA 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McEWEN, P.J.E.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Jacqueline and Howard Wright, in their own right, and as parents and natural guardians of Jared Wright, bring this appeal from the order granting the motion of appellees-defendants to dismiss this products liability action on the basis of forum non conveniens. We reverse.

¶ 2 Appellants, residents of Texas, instituted this products liability action after their son, minor-appellant, Jared Wright, was diagnosed with severe neurological damage. Appellants allege that Jared’s condition was caused by his exposure to high levels of mercury found in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Farley v. McDonnell Douglas Truck Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Jessop v. ACF INDUSTRIES, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Engstrom v. Bayer Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Humes v. Eckerd Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bochetto, G. v. Dimeling, Schreiber & ParkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Bochetto v. Piper Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Hunter v. SHIRE US, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Vaughan Estate of Vaughan v. Olympus Am., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Black, P. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API