Lee v. MacOn County Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill as amended sought accounting and redemption. The decree denied relief and that action is assigned as error.
The testimony was taken orally in open court, before the judge rendering the final decree, and is supported by the intendment that obtains. Hodge et al. v. Joy et al., 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171; Andrews et al. v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152, 74 So. 62.
The provisions of the note and mortgage are for past indebtedness and future advances to be made by the mortgagee, and are specific and unequivocal; their terms touching the right of foreclosure, however, are meager. These…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- J. H. Morris, Inc. v. Indian Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- George v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Emens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Garvich v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.