Legal Opinion
Galarza v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 12, 1998No. Civil No. 97-1732H(AJB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Request for Protective Order
BATTAGLIA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Galarza moves the Court for a Protective Order to prevent Defendant United States from engaging in ex parte communications with Plaintiffs physicians. Plaintiff has filed a motion and reply, and Defendant has filed an opposition. A hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Battaglia on April 24, 1998. Michael Feldman, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Steven Poliakoff, Esq. and Nita Stormes, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendant. Based upon the papers submitted by both parties, and upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Maricopa Audubon Society v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Sipes v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
- Felder v. WymanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION United States of America, Movant-Appellee, v. John Doe, Interested-Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Crenshaw v. Mony Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Syposs v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Newport Pacific Inc. v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2001
- Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.