Legal Opinion
Felder v. Wyman
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided August 7, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 3:91-797-15PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge,
sitting by designation.
This matter is currently before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a protective order, filed June 6, 1991, pursuant to Rule 26(c), Fed.R.Civ.Proc. Plaintiff seeks an order prohibiting defendants, their counsel, or their agents from conferring informally with any of the non-party physicians involved in the treatment of the decedent without plaintiff’s consent and unless done in the presence of plaintiff’s counsel or by deposition under the formal discovery rules. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion.
I
Amy Felder was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Horner v. Rowan Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Cua v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Samms v. District Court, Fourth Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Gobuty v. KavanaghDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Perkins Ex Rel. Miles v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.