Legal Opinion
Sipes v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 1, 1986No. Civ. No. 84-2236-E(CM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROGER CURTIS McKEE, United States Magistrate.
The United States’ Motion for a Continuance and for a Protective Order came on for hearing on June 19, 1986 before the Honorable Roger Curtis McKee. The plaintiff, Lois M. Sipes was represented by Daniel T. Broderick, III, and the United States was represented by and through Peter K. Nunez, United States Attorney, and Karen M. Shichman, Assistant U.S. Attorney. Having duly considered the arguments of counsel and finding them to be well founded:
The United States brought a Motion for a Continuance and for a Protective Order in response to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Charles J. Slakan v. T.C. Porter, M.M. Walters, Amos Reed, Ralph Edwards, Sam Garrison, and J.B. Barefoot, J.G. Watson, D.R. Woodard, Jack LemonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- In Re Dr. John Doe, M.D., a Witness Before the January 1982 Additional Grand Jury. Dr. John Doe, M.D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Gomez-Candelaria v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Schroeder v. Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Estate of Edward W. Knoster v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.