Legal Opinion

Martin v. County of Santa Barbara

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1894No. 19449PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This action was brought to recover the sum of three hundred and fifty-nine dollars and forty cents for fees alleged to be due the plaintiff. as a constable of the second township of said county.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, written findings filed, and a judgment rendered thereon in favor of plaintiff for two hundred and twenty-two dollars and seventy cents and costs, from which judgment said plaintiff appeals.

The cause was submitted to the court upon the pleadings and upon certain written stipulation of facts agreed to and signed by the attorneys for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cowdin v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Treu v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sarter v. Siskiyou CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Sturgeon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Arnold v. SullengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API