Legal Opinion

In re Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 2004No. 25895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into two Agreements for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the first agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of any sanction up to and including a two year definite suspension from the practice of law. See Rule 7, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. We accept the first agreement and impose a definite suspension of two years from the practice of law. In the second agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZdrokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Stratmore v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. SignerKentucky Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re PrendergastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. In the Matter of Timothy MosesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. In the Matter of Frank Barnwell McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. In re CromartieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. In the Matter of Frank Barnwell McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API