Legal Opinion

People v. Pilbro

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1927No. Docket No. 977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

On the eighth day of March, 1927, an information was filed in the superior court of the county of El Dorado accusing the defendants Charles Pilbro and Frank X. Walsh of the crime of wilfully and unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, etc., in said county. Both of the defendants, upon trial, were convicted. The defendant Walsh interposed a motion for new trial, which motion was denied, and thereupon said defendant appealed to this court from the order denying his motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered against him in said cause.

No contention is made that the evidence is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. KrompholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. SchaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PersingerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. State v. RivenburghUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API