Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1929No. Docket No. 1700PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETCH, J., pro tem.

The appellant, Henry J. Peterson, together with Hoyt W. Smith and Thomas I. Boreman, was charged with burglary in an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County. Peterson was found guilty of burglary in the second degree and Smith and Boreman were acquitted. This appeal is taken from the order denying Peterson’s motion for a new trial and from the judgment of conviction.

Immediately prior to and at the time of his arrest Peterson was engaged in the business of repairing and renewing auto tops in the town of Sawtelle. Smith and Boreman were inmates of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. OuteverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. ArmentroutAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
  3. People v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. MesserlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. HobbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API