Legal Opinion

State v. Persinger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1963No. 36512PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stafford, J. †

Arthur St. Peter and Lee Roy Persinger, the appellant, were charged jointly with the crime of robbery. Appellant’s motion for a separate trial was denied.

At the time of trial, appellant was required to join with his codefendant in the exercise of all peremptory challenges to the jury. This presented no difficulty during the first five joint challenges. However, on the sixth and last peremptory challenge, Mr. St. Peter refused to join therein and the court denied appellant the opportunity to use it individually. Appellant duly excepted to the court’s ruling. July 24, 1961, the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Darrin v. GouldWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API