Legal Opinion

Russell v. Colorado Division of Employment

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1989No. 88CA0866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge JONES.

In this workmen’s compensation case, the question before the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) was whether the average weekly wage for Ronald W. Russell (claimant) should include amounts contributed by his employer for life insurance, health insurance, and his non-vested retirement benefits. The Panel concluded that the non-vested contribution to a retirement fund could not be included but that the other contributions were proper. In his petition for reyiew, claimant contends that he is entitled to have the employer’s contributions to the Public Employees…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Murphy v. Ampex Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Compensation Insurance Authority v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Nelson v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sunland Training Ctr. v. IrvingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Lamar v. KoehnColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Meeker v. Provenant Health PartnersColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Noel v. Rolscreen Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API