Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Ampex Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1985No. 84CA0985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

In this workmen’s compensation case, the sole issue before us is whether the value of group health insurance and supplemental life insurance provided by claimant’s employer should have been included by the Industrial Commission in determining the amount of wage loss attributable to claimant Murphy’s injury. We rule that these items should have been included and set aside the order.

In determining the permanent financial loss to a claimant under § 8-51-108, C.R.S., the Commission must consider the monetary loss which claimant sustained as a result of an injury and the subsequent…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Erakovic v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State Compensation Insurance Authority v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API