Legal Opinion
Meeker v. Provenant Health Partners
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1996No. 95CA0904PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
The issue in this workers’ compensation proceeding is whether the value of leave time credited to the employee, Margaret Meeker, during the course of her employment with Provenant Health Partners, is to be considered as “wages” under the pertinent 1992 statutory provision, Colo.Sess. Laws 1991, ch. 219, § 8-40-201(9) at 1293-1294. Based upon the parties’ written stipulation of facts, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concluded that such credit was required to be considered as such. The Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) disagreed and modified the AL J’s order…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Petrafeck v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- City of Daytona Beach v. AmselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Schelly v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Lamar v. KoehnColorado Court of Appeals · 1998