Legal Opinion
City of Lamar v. Koehn
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1998No. 98CA0233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Judge HUME.
In this workers’ compensation proceeding, City of Lamar (employer) and its insurer, Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (collectively CCIA), petition for review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which included the value of employer contributions to claimant’s pension benefits in the avérage weekly wage computation for Gary L. Koehn (claimant). Claimant also appeals the exclusion of the value of his vacation and sick leave in this calculation. We conclude that none of these items should be included in the calculation of claimant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Murphy v. Ampex Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Gregory v. Crown TransportationColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- Meeker v. Provenant Health PartnersColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Erakovic v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Erakovic v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State ex rel. Matheny v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.