Legal Opinion

People v. Tillman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1965No. Crim. 5027PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

On this appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of narcotics (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500), defendant, Phillip G. Tillman, asserts that the following errors require a reversal of the judgment: (1) the insufficiency of the showing of probable cause in the affidavit upon which the search warrant was based; (2) lack of reasonable or probable cause for arrest in the absence of a valid search warrant; and (3) denial of his constitutional right to the effective aid of counsel.

Since no contentions are raised concerning the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. ScomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. ChimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. BenjaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API