Legal Opinion

People v. Scoma

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969No. Crim. No. 12562PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendant Gwendolyn Lee Scoma was charged by information with possession of marijuana in violation of section 11530' of the Health and Safety Code. Following arraignment she moved that the information be set aside because she had been held to answer without reasonable and probable cause (Pen. Code, §995) in that the only evidence against her was obtained through execution of a search warrant based upon an affidavit insufficient on its face.1 The motion was granted, and the People appeal from the order setting aside the information. (Pen. Code, § 123S, subd. 1.)

The’affidavit whose sufficiency…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. KurlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API