People v. Chimel
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
In this case our conclusion that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed rests upon the following propositions: (1) Although the warrants for arrest eonstitu*438tionally failed under People v. Sesslin, ante, p. 418 [67 Cal. Rptr. 409, 439 P.2d 321], the arrests themselves can stand upon the ground of probable cause; (2) since the search of defendant’s home at the time of the execution of the first arrest warrant constituted a “reasonable” search, the coins and other numismatic items thereby siezed could properly be introduced into evidence; (3) the failure to strike count II from the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ClomanOregon Supreme Court · 1969
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.