Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969No. Crim. 12642PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants were charged by information with possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, §11500) and in a second count with possession for sale of amphetamine, a restricted dangerous drug (Health & Saf. Code, § 11911). After a trial by jury they were found guilty as charged, .and' each was sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. They appeal from the judgments.

On July 14) 1967, about 11:20 p.m., Edward Noriega, a state narcotics agent, together with several other law enforcement officers, went to a single-family residence in Upland, California, for the purpose of executing a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Jaben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. People v. GasteloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API