Legal Opinion

Carr v. Stern

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1911No. Civ. No. 845PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing to change the place of trial of an action. J. J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. W. Charles, Frederick Schneider, and Willard, Swart, Ferrell & McGovern, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s application for a change of the place of trial of this action.

The action was brought to recover the sum of $25,060 for personal injuries alleged by the complaint to have been inflicted upon plaintiff through the carelessness and negligence of defendants.

According to the averments of the complaint, on the morning of the ninth day of July, 1909, while the plaintiff was riding a bicycle on and over á certain highway in the city of Palo Alto, in Santa Clara county, the automobile of defendants, driven by their chauffeur behind and to the rear of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cunningham v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Towle v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Naylor v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Lowenthal v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Latky v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API