Legal Opinion

M&D, INC v. McCONKEY

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. Docket 175201PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, P.J.

Plaintiffs purchased on an “as is” basis commercial property on West Michigan Avenue in Jackson, Michigan. Following its pinchase, the property suffered a damaging flood. Plaintiffs later discovered that the property had an undisclosed history of significant flooding. Plaintiffs argue that both the sellers and the real estate agents are liable for fraud, misrepresentation, and negligence for failing to disclose this flooding problem. In addition, plaintiffs claim that defendant State of Michigan, Department of Transportation (mdot), is liable for failing to maintain or properly construct a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bergen v. BakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Custom Data Solutions, Inc v. Preferred Capital, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Lakeside Oakland Development, LC v. H & J Beef Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Quintain Development, LLC v. Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API