Legal Opinion

Bergen v. Baker

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2005No. Docket 248214PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants 1 under MCE 2.116(C)(10) and the order denying plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. This action was filed after plaintiffs purchased a home from defendants in 2001 and then discovered a significant leak in the glass-paned roof of a sunroom, or alternately referred to as the hot tub room, that is attached to the back of the house. We reverse.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint sounding in fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract arising out of defendants’ alleged failure to disclose the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Zaremba Equipment, Inc. v. Harco National InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Roberts v. SaffellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. MacDonald v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. Aron Alan, LLC v. Tanfran, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. MONAVIE, LLC v. Quixtar Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API