La Jolla Cove Motel & Hotel Apartments, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
In this case we are presented with the issue of whether it is appropriate under the California State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 2-100 1 for attorneys to contact directors for a represented corporation where the directors’ separate counsel consents to the contact, but counsel for the corporation does not. We conclude that under the facts of this case, such contact is not barred by rule 2-100. We further conclude that even if there were a violation of rule 2-100, the court was correct not to order the disqualification of the offending attorneys as there is no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Skarbrevik v. Cohen, England & WhitfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gong v. RFG Oil, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ontiveros v. Constable CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of San Diego v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Havasu Lakeshore Investments, LLC v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Blakely v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.