Legal Opinion

Skarbrevik v. Cohen, England & Whitfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1991No. B039981PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

Attorney Stuart A. Comis and the law firm of Cohen, England & Whitfield appeal from a judgment entered against them and in favor of plaintiff Gunnar Skarbrevik after a jury trial on the issues of conspiracy to defraud and professional negligence. The principal questions presented in this appeal concern the liability of counsel of a close corporation to a minority shareholder for professional negligence, and the liability of a corporate attorney for conspiring with majority shareholders to defraud the minority shareholder by wrongfully diluting his interest in the corporation.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API