City of San Diego v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.
*461As codified in Evidence Code section 950 et seq., the attorney-client privilege seeks to prevent the disclosure of confidential communications between the lawyer and the client. In the typical situation, where a question at trial or a pretrial discovery request seeks disclosure of arguably privileged information, an objection to the question or request is raised and the trial *607court rules on the objection based on whether the privilege applies. If the objection is overruled, the party or witness is ordered to answer or respond; if the objection is sustained, the question or request goes…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jane Doe v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Big Lots Stores v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bowen v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Doe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- John Edwards v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.