Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 19, 2018No. D073961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDato, J.

*461As codified in Evidence Code section 950 et seq., the attorney-client privilege seeks to prevent the disclosure of confidential communications between the lawyer and the client. In the typical situation, where a question at trial or a pretrial discovery request seeks disclosure of arguably privileged information, an objection to the question or request is raised and the trial *607court rules on the objection based on whether the privilege applies. If the objection is overruled, the party or witness is ordered to answer or respond; if the objection is sustained, the question or request goes…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jane Doe v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Big Lots Stores v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Bowen v. LinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Doe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. John Edwards v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API