Legal Opinion
Havasu Lakeshore Investments, LLC v. Fleming
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 2013No. G047244; G047329PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
The trial court disqualified a law firm from simultaneously representing a limited liability company, its managing member (a partnership), and the person who managed that partnership (who was not himself a member of the company) in a lawsuit against two of the company’s minority members. The court found that the interests of the company and the nonmember individual potentially conflicted, and concluded the law firm could not jointly represent the company and the nonmember individual against the company’s minority members. The court based its ruling on rule 3-310(C) of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- M'Guinness v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Coldren v. Hart, King & Coldren, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Centex Homes v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- D'ull v. Kaye CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.