Legal Opinion
Voilas v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 1, 1999No. Civ.A. 95-487(GEB)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WOLFSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is a motion, in limine, by defendant, General Motors Corporation (“GM”), seeking to preclude the testimony and reports of Frank D. Tinari, Ph.D., plaintiffs’ proffered liability and punitive damages expert. Specifically, GM seeks to preclude Dr. Tinari’s July 2, 1999, liability report and supplement to that report, as well as his July 16, 1999, punitive damages report. The Court has reviewed the moving; opposition, reply, and supplemental papers submitted by all the parties, and heard oral argument on September 7,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Crowley v. ChaitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Groobert v. PRESIDENT AND DIRS. OF GEORGETOWN COL.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hamilton v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.