Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 2004No. Civil Action 01-5240PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.635
II. BACKGROUND.636
A. ENGINEERING REPORT 213.637
B. HARTZELL’S ALLEGED CONCEALMENT FROM THE FAA.640
C. OVERHAUL REQUIREMENTS.642
D. 1989 PROPELLER OVERHAUL.643
III. DISCUSSION.
A. STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
B. THE GENERAL AVIATION REVITALIZATION ACT OF 1994 (“GARA”).
C. GARA § 2(B): KNOWING MISREPRESENTATION, OR CONCEALMENT, OR WITHHOLDING EXCEPTION. .fx
1. Hartzell’s Motions in Limine to Preclude Testimony of Dr. McSwain and Mr. Twa. , rx
2. Evidence of Knowing Misrepresentation. . rx
a. High Vibratory Stress. .ix
b. Dampers. cn
rn
cn
e…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Krys v. AaronDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Willett v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Larry Crouch v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.