May v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the plaintiff (condominium unit owner) has a claim against the condominium association’s insurer whose policy was issued to the (condominium owners’) association. We answer in the negative and hold that the trial court’s dismissal of the claim is error-free.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶ 2 The plaintiff, Dr. June C. May (Owner), brought a claim against the Waterford Homeowners Association (condominium owners’ association hereafter called Association), Ray’s Sewer Service, Inc., and Mid-Century Insurance Company (Insurer) for acts or omissions…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Gens v. Casady SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Ostrovitz & Gwinn, LLC v. First Specialty Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.