Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gohl
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Jayne, C. C. J.
The trial of this action resulted in the direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Alfred F. Gohl. An exception to the ruling was allowed hut the attorney of the defendant has desired a rule to show cause pursuant to which he assigns the substance of the exception as a reason for the allowance of a new trial.
A rapid summary of the significant facts will exhibit the subject debated. Antecedently, a promissory note made by Florence James and her father Albert Gohl and payable to Pauline Y. Gohl, the mother of Florence, had been discounted for value by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First National Bank v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Cedar State Bank v. OlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Giberson v. First Nat. Bk., Spring LakeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Union & New Haven Trust Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene StollerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Chera v. the ShoresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. HasslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950