Legal Opinion
Chera v. the Shores
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 27, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
145 N.J. Super. 19 (1976)
366 A.2d 994
MORRIS CHERA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE SHORES, A PARTNERSHIP, MICHAEL SANDOMENO AND MORITZ NAPPE, DEFENDANTS. (MICHAEL SANDOMENO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; MORITZ NAPPE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT).
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 6, 1976.
Decided October 27, 1976.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Joseph Meehan argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Michael Sandomeno.
Mr. Thomas W. Cavanagh, Jr., argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Chamlin, Schottland & Rosen, attorneys; Mr. Cavanagh and Mr. Michael D.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Franklin Discount Co. v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Silva v. GordoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. GohlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Delman v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fr. Winkler Kg v. Gene Stoller v. Helmut Winkler, Martha Winkler Fuhst, Kurt Maier, Walter Schnee, and Franz Remensberger. Appeal of Gene StollerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Brames v. CratesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ventures, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Brames v. CratesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980