Legal Opinion
Sacks v. Rothberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1990No. 88-111PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellant Pauline Sacks and Marvin Sacks appeal from the involuntary dismissal pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 41(b) of their lawsuit against appellee Herbert Rothberg based on a Settlement Agreement and Promissory Note. The principal issues before the trial court concerned the anniversary date of the Note and the terms for prepayment of the Note, specifically whether appellee defaulted on the Note when he paid $4,250 on April 5, 1984, instead of $6,750, and whether the $178,800 tendered by appellee in April 1987 was sufficient to prepay the remainder of the $1,560,000 Note.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., and Eastern Shore Development Corporation, Debtors, Appeal of Vigdor SchreibmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Redmond v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.