United States v. State of California
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacBRIDE, Chief Judge.
At the turn of the century, a burgeoning nation was in the midst of Western expansion. Hampering this expansion, however, was the simple geographical fact that great areas within the Western states and territories encompassed arid and semiarid lands. By the enactment of the Reclamation Act of 1902, Title 43 U.S.C. § 371 et seq., Congress concluded that much of these arid and semiarid lands could be made habitable and fruitful by the construction of federally-funded irrigation works.
Now, 73 years, dozens of projects, and billions of dollars later, this court is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Town of Springfield, Vermont v. McCarrenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1982
- County of Trinity v. AndrusDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United States of America, and v. State of California, State Water Resources Control Board, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.